TheStreet.com: FedEx Looks to Deliver—to Senators
June 15
NY Times: Drivers May Not Join Union at FedEx Home, Court Rules
April 23
BRIEF: Teamsters Say FedEx Ground Drivers Remain Targets Despite Ruling
April 23
FedEx to Lay Off 1,000
April 03
Teamsters Respond to FedEx Threat
March 25
$6.7 billion threat: FedEx warns lawmakers over union legislation
March 25
Choose a Category or a State or a Search Term for a more specific search
This case was filed in U.S. District Court for Massachusetts but since consolidated into the FedEx Ground multi-district litigation now before the U.S. District Court for Northern Indiana. Since August 2005, drivers of non-commercial vehicles - vehicles of gross vehicle weight less than 10,000 lbs - have been eligible for overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Prior to August 2005, drivers of non-commercial vehicles were exempted from the FLSA and state wage laws and not eligible for state overtime wages. The claims allege that drivers are misclassified as ‘contractors’ but controlled like employees and thus are owed overtime wages under the state laws.
This case was filed in U.S. District Court for Massachusetts in 2005. This case is a member case of the FedEx Ground/Home Multi-District Litigation case.
This NLRB case involved Teamsters Local Union 25 and a FedEx Home Delivery terminal in Wilmington, MA in 2006. Teamsters Local Union 25 filed for an election with the National Labor Relations Board in Summer 2006. The NLRB found that drivers are employees and are eligible to vote while multiple route contractors are statutory supervisors and not eligible to vote. Wilmington drivers voted for Local 25 in Oct. 2006. The NLRB certified the election in June 2007. The NLRB charged the company with failing to bargain under the NLRA in July 2007 and ordered the company to bargain. On Oct. 1, the company filed a petition for review of the NLRB ruling that the drivers are employees in the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit.
This appeal stems from an unemployment insurance claim filed by Robert Williams, a former FedEx Home Delivery driver. Williams, who was involved in the Teamsters organizing driver at the Northboro terminal, was ruled to be an “employee” of FedEx. As of Sept. 1, there is no information on any FedEx request for further appeal.
This case involves Teamsters Local Union 170 organizing efforts at the FedEx Home Delivery station in Northboro, MA in 2005. Teamsters Local 170 filed for an election with the National Labor Relations Board in December 2005. Teamsters Local 170 asked for a delay in the election after filing a number of unfair labor practices. NLRB Region 1 issued a complaint in March 2007 against the company for its anti-union activities in the course of the election. Local 170, five drivers and the company reached a settlement in Oct. 2007. An election is scheduled for February 2008.
To view nationwide documents click here.