TheStreet.com: FedEx Looks to Deliver—to Senators
June 15
NY Times: Drivers May Not Join Union at FedEx Home, Court Rules
April 23
BRIEF: Teamsters Say FedEx Ground Drivers Remain Targets Despite Ruling
April 23
FedEx to Lay Off 1,000
April 03
Teamsters Respond to FedEx Threat
March 25
$6.7 billion threat: FedEx warns lawmakers over union legislation
March 25
Choose a Category or a State or a Search Term for a more specific search
The case before the U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit was filed in 2005. The case appeals the National Labor Relations Board decision in “Grass and FedEx Freight.”
This case stems from a petition for election before the National Labor Relations Board filed by Teamsters Local 177 at a FedEx Ground facility in Fairfield, NJ in 2004. The NLRB Region 22 ruled in Nov 2004 that the drivers were employees and not “contractors” as claimed by FedEx Ground.
This case stems from a filing for election before the National Labor Relations Board by the FXGHD Drivers Association in Barrington, NJ in 2005. The NLRB Region 4 ruled that the drivers were employees and not “contractors” as claimed by FedEx Ground. The election results are still pending.
This case involves Teamsters Local Union 170 organizing efforts at the FedEx Home Delivery station in Northboro, MA in 2005. Teamsters Local 170 filed for an election with the National Labor Relations Board in December 2005. Teamsters Local 170 asked for a delay in the election after filing a number of unfair labor practices. NLRB Region 1 issued a complaint in March 2007 against the company for its anti-union activities in the course of the election. Local 170, five drivers and the company reached a settlement in Oct. 2007. An election is scheduled for February 2008.