TheStreet.com: FedEx Looks to Deliver—to Senators
June 15
NY Times: Drivers May Not Join Union at FedEx Home, Court Rules
April 23
BRIEF: Teamsters Say FedEx Ground Drivers Remain Targets Despite Ruling
April 23
FedEx to Lay Off 1,000
April 03
Teamsters Respond to FedEx Threat
March 25
$6.7 billion threat: FedEx warns lawmakers over union legislation
March 25
Choose a Category or a State or a Search Term for a more specific search
This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for Colorado in 2003; the case settled in December 2005. The plaintiffs are former FedEx Ground drivers who alleged that certain verbal commitments by FedEx recruiters violated laws against fraud, breach of implied contract and deceptive trade practices.
This case originated in Superior Court for New Jersey Burlington County in 2006. FedEx was granted a removal order to U.S. District Court for New Jersey but was not granted a motion to move it into the multi-district litigation proceedings. FedEx moved to compel arbitration and the plaintiffs opposed by claiming the arbitration clause of the FedEx Ground “Operating Agreement” was unconscionable. In October 2007, the Judge ruled that the arbitration clause was both procedurally and substantially unconscionable.